-
Christopher Warren deposited The Early Modern Book of Numbers in the group
TM Book History, Print Cultures, Lexicography on MLA Commons 3 months, 2 weeks ago
A book’s a book, and numbers are numbers, right? Well, maybe. For the Shakespeare Association of America seminar on “Counting (in) Early Modern Drama,” I proposed to give myself the task of understanding and then communicating the technological underpinnings of a digital facsimile. One specific question I wanted to address, with the help of…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited The Early Modern Book of Numbers in the group
LLC Shakespeare on MLA Commons 3 months, 2 weeks ago
A book’s a book, and numbers are numbers, right? Well, maybe. For the Shakespeare Association of America seminar on “Counting (in) Early Modern Drama,” I proposed to give myself the task of understanding and then communicating the technological underpinnings of a digital facsimile. One specific question I wanted to address, with the help of…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited The Early Modern Book of Numbers in the group
Digital Humanities on MLA Commons 3 months, 2 weeks ago
A book’s a book, and numbers are numbers, right? Well, maybe. For the Shakespeare Association of America seminar on “Counting (in) Early Modern Drama,” I proposed to give myself the task of understanding and then communicating the technological underpinnings of a digital facsimile. One specific question I wanted to address, with the help of…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited The Early Modern Book of Numbers in the group
CLCS Renaissance and Early Modern on MLA Commons 3 months, 2 weeks ago
A book’s a book, and numbers are numbers, right? Well, maybe. For the Shakespeare Association of America seminar on “Counting (in) Early Modern Drama,” I proposed to give myself the task of understanding and then communicating the technological underpinnings of a digital facsimile. One specific question I wanted to address, with the help of…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited The Early Modern Book of Numbers on Humanities Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
A book’s a book, and numbers are numbers, right? Well, maybe. For the Shakespeare Association of America seminar on “Counting (in) Early Modern Drama,” I proposed to give myself the task of understanding and then communicating the technological underpinnings of a digital facsimile. One specific question I wanted to address, with the help of…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Who Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio? in the group
TM Book History, Print Cultures, Lexicography on MLA Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” 2 Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Who Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio? in the group
LLC Shakespeare on MLA Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” 2 Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Who Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio? in the group
LLC 17th-Century English on MLA Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” 2 Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Who Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio? in the group
CLCS Renaissance and Early Modern on MLA Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” 2 Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Who Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth Folio? on Humanities Commons 3 months, 3 weeks ago
According to Fredson Bowers, writing in Shakespeare Quarterly in 1951, we will never know the printer of that section “until we know everything there is to be learned about seventeenth-century types.” 2 Bowers doubted we could ever list the full set of F4’s printers because F4 was printed anonymously, and the volume left few clues about its…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Angels and Diplomats: A Pleromatic Paradigm for Human Rights on Humanities Commons 1 year, 3 months ago
Parts I and II of this Article show as a descriptive matter that the conceptual histories of early modern angels and diplomats are interlinked, and that their shared etymology opens into a new intellectual history of human rights—one that extends and, in some cases, revises previous work by thinkers like Jacques Derrida, Carl S…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Canst Thou Draw Out Leviathan with Computational Bibliography? New Angles on Printing Thomas Hobbes’ “Ornaments” Edition in the group
TM Book History, Print Cultures, Lexicography on MLA Commons 1 year, 11 months ago
This article attributes one of the three “first” editions of Leviathan to the London printer John Richardson (fl. 1673–1703), revising Noel Malcolm’s attribution to a different printer in the recent Clarendon Edition of Leviathan. We lay out the mystery of Leviathan’s so-called “Ornaments” edition and use evidence from damaged type pieces to say…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Canst Thou Draw Out Leviathan with Computational Bibliography? New Angles on Printing Thomas Hobbes’ “Ornaments” Edition in the group
LLC Restoration and Early-18th-Century English on MLA Commons 1 year, 11 months ago
This article attributes one of the three “first” editions of Leviathan to the London printer John Richardson (fl. 1673–1703), revising Noel Malcolm’s attribution to a different printer in the recent Clarendon Edition of Leviathan. We lay out the mystery of Leviathan’s so-called “Ornaments” edition and use evidence from damaged type pieces to say…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Canst Thou Draw Out Leviathan with Computational Bibliography? New Angles on Printing Thomas Hobbes’ “Ornaments” Edition in the group
Digital Humanities on MLA Commons 1 year, 11 months ago
This article attributes one of the three “first” editions of Leviathan to the London printer John Richardson (fl. 1673–1703), revising Noel Malcolm’s attribution to a different printer in the recent Clarendon Edition of Leviathan. We lay out the mystery of Leviathan’s so-called “Ornaments” edition and use evidence from damaged type pieces to say…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Canst Thou Draw Out Leviathan with Computational Bibliography? New Angles on Printing Thomas Hobbes’ “Ornaments” Edition on Humanities Commons 1 year, 11 months ago
This article attributes one of the three “first” editions of Leviathan to the London printer John Richardson (fl. 1673–1703), revising Noel Malcolm’s attribution to a different printer in the recent Clarendon Edition of Leviathan. We lay out the mystery of Leviathan’s so-called “Ornaments” edition and use evidence from damaged type pieces to say…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Damaged Type and Areopagitica’s Clandestine Printers in the group
TM Book History, Print Cultures, Lexicography on MLA Commons 3 years, 3 months ago
Milton’s Areopagitica (1644) is one of the most significant texts in the history of the freedom of the press, and yet the pamphlet’s clandestine printers have successfully eluded identification for over 375 years. By examining distinctive and dam-aged type pieces from 100 pamphlets from the 1640s, this article att…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Damaged Type and Areopagitica’s Clandestine Printers in the group
TC Law and the Humanities on MLA Commons 3 years, 3 months ago
Milton’s Areopagitica (1644) is one of the most significant texts in the history of the freedom of the press, and yet the pamphlet’s clandestine printers have successfully eluded identification for over 375 years. By examining distinctive and dam-aged type pieces from 100 pamphlets from the 1640s, this article att…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Damaged Type and Areopagitica’s Clandestine Printers in the group
TC Digital Humanities on MLA Commons 3 years, 3 months ago
Milton’s Areopagitica (1644) is one of the most significant texts in the history of the freedom of the press, and yet the pamphlet’s clandestine printers have successfully eluded identification for over 375 years. By examining distinctive and dam-aged type pieces from 100 pamphlets from the 1640s, this article att…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Damaged Type and Areopagitica’s Clandestine Printers in the group
LLC 17th-Century English on MLA Commons 3 years, 3 months ago
Milton’s Areopagitica (1644) is one of the most significant texts in the history of the freedom of the press, and yet the pamphlet’s clandestine printers have successfully eluded identification for over 375 years. By examining distinctive and dam-aged type pieces from 100 pamphlets from the 1640s, this article att…[Read more]
-
Christopher Warren deposited Leviathan and the Airway: Black Lives Matter and Hobbes with the History Put Back on Humanities Commons 3 years, 3 months ago
With Thomas Hobbes’ political iconography in the background, Kadir Nelson’s recent cover for The New Yorker evokes what Charles Mills calls “the racial contract.” Nelson’s George Floyd rises out of the landscape of Black history much like Hobbes’ sovereign, but Floyd — in stark contrast to Hobbes’ sword-bearing “person of the State” — is, quit…[Read more]
- Load More