-
In defence of science - non sole
- Author(s):
- Jacek Ben Silberstein (see profile)
- Date:
- 2021
- Group(s):
- Digital Humanists, Philosophy, Publishing and the Publicly Engaged Humanities, RSA Student Community, Science and Technology Studies (STS)
- Subject(s):
- Censorship, Publications, Research, Collective memory, Publishers and publishing, Research--Evaluation, Needs assessment
- Item Type:
- Essay
- Tag(s):
- anticorruption, Replication Crisis, Publication research, Public memory, Publishing, Research impact, Research needs
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/cvqh-3503
- Abstract:
- Abstract: The freedom of research is a cornerstone of our civilisation; in many ways it can even be seen as a human right. However, freedom of research does not mean the liberty to cheat. Cheating in science – deliberate falsification of evidence to support a hypothesis – is not only academic misconduct; it is also a crime against society and the truth. This article sets the bold road map for honest and radical proceedings aiming to mitigate the replication crisis
- Metadata:
- xml
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 2 years ago
- License:
- All-Rights-Granted
- Share this:
An online community for ASEEES members
2preprint-refs_a_lawyer_-1.docx