-
In Reply to Marco Beretta
- Author(s):
- Francesco Luzzini (see profile)
- Date:
- 2020
- Group(s):
- Digital Humanists, GeoHumanities, Historiography, Science Studies and the History of Science
- Subject(s):
- Science, History, Science--Philosophy, Academic writing, Debates and debating
- Item Type:
- Article
- Tag(s):
- Italy, Dispute, cronyism, nepotism, scholarly traditions, History of science, Philosophy of science, Debate, Scholarship of teaching and learning
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/w0xd-g421
- Abstract:
- On scholarly traditions, quantitative assessments, and academic malpractices in Italy - and how someone disagreed (Isis, Vol. 110, n. S1, pp. 15-17 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/707594)
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article Show details
- Pub. DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1086/707594
- Journal:
- Isis
- Volume:
- 110
- Issue:
- S1
- Page Range:
- 18 - 20
- ISSN:
- 0021-1753
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 3 years ago
- License:
- All Rights Reserved
- Share this: