• Using ancestral state reconstruction methods for onomasiological reconstruction in multilingual word lists

    Author(s):
    Gerhard Jäger, Johann-Mattis LIst (see profile)
    Date:
    2018
    Group(s):
    Classical Philology and Linguistics, Digital Humanists, Digital Humanities East Asia
    Item Type:
    Article
    Tag(s):
    computer-assisted language comparison, ancestral state reconstruction, Chinese, Indo-European, Austronesian, computational historical linguistics
    Permanent URL:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/bg3w-3n98
    Abstract:
    Current efforts in computational historical linguistics are predominantly concerned with phylogenetic inference. Methods for ancestral state reconstruction have only been applied sporadically. In contrast to phylogenetic algorithms, automatic reconstruction methods presuppose phylogenetic information in order to explain what has evolved when and where. Here we report a pilot study exploring how well automatic methods for ancestral state reconstruction perform in the task of onomasiological reconstruction in multilingual word lists, where algorithms are used to infer how the words evolved along a given phylogeny, and reconstruct which cognate classes were used to express a given meaning in the ancestral languages. Comparing three different methods, Maximum Parsimony, Minimal Lateral Networks, and Maximum Likeli- hood on three different test sets (Indo-European, Austronesian, Chinese) using binary and multi-state coding of the data as well as single and sampled phylogenies, we find that Maximum Likelihood largely outperforms the other methods. At the same time, however, the general performance was disappointingly low, ranging between 0.66 (Chinese) and 0.79 (Austronesian) for the F-Scores. A closer linguistic evaluation of the reconstructions proposed by the best method and the reconstructions given in the gold standards revealed that the majority of the cases where the algorithms failed can be attributed to problems of independent semantic shift (homoplasy), to morphological processes in lexical change, and to wrong reconstructions in the independently created test sets that we employed.
    Metadata:
    xml
    Published as:
    Journal article     Show details
    Pub. DOI:
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00801002
    Publisher:
    Brill
    Pub. Date:
    2018-6-22
    Journal:
    Language Dynamics and Change
    Volume:
    8
    Issue:
    1
    Page Range:
    22 - 54
    ISSN:
    2210-5824,2210-5832
    Status:
    Published
    Last Updated:
    4 years ago
    License:
    All Rights Reserved
    Share this:

    Downloads

    Item Name: pdf jaeger-list-2018-ancestral-state-reconstruction.pdf
      Download View in browser
    Activity: Downloads: 277

    Back to Deposits